🏠 Disproportionate Impact on Black & Brown Families

https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/rockcms/2022-12/221207-arizona-child-welfare-main-cover-cs-0b5181.jpg
https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/styles/embed_xxl/public/media_2022/11/202211crd_us_foster_removalrate_1.jpg?itok=GBmn9WqM

Surveillance & suspicion

  • Families of color — especially Black, Indigenous, and Latino communities — face higher scrutiny in the child welfare system. For example, the Minnesota African American Family Preservation and Child Welfare Disproportionality Act explicitly names racial disparities in its title. MN DCYF
  • According to the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, children from certain racial/ethnic groups are involved in the child welfare system at nearly twice the rate of their share of the population. Department of Justice

“Blind removal” as attempted reform — and its limitations

  • The concept of “blind removal” means removing identifying factors (like race, neighborhood, income level) from initial decision-making in child protection. The hope: reduce implicit bias.
  • But even if one step is made “blind,” downstream systems still operate in a broader structural context: families of color often have fewer resources (housing, legal advocacy, social capital) and thus greater vulnerability to removal and longer paths to reunification.
  • The dystopian dimension: A parent may feel watched, judged, and punished simply for navigating poverty, adversity, or trauma — rather than being supported to heal and keep their children with them.

Recovery & reunification: the uphill climb

  • Once removed, the process to reunify can require parents to complete multiple tasks: housing, treatment programs, visitation schedules, court hearings. For Black and brown families this can mean juggling – often without sufficient support – jobs, childcare, transport, and the stigma of being under scrutiny.
  • The emotional toll is heavy: grief at loss of children, fear of making one mistake, the sense of being in a “child welfare machine” rather than receiving compassionate support.
  • The system can feel punitive rather than restorative: instead of “How can we help you keep your child?”, it sometimes feels like “Complete these tasks or else.”

Legacy of structural injustice

  • How we got here: centuries of state control over Black, Brown, Indigenous families (from slavery, through foster/adoption practices targeting Indigenous children, to over-policing of poor neighborhoods). The child welfare system doesn’t operate in a vacuum.
  • In 2022, the American Bar Association adopted Resolution 606, explicitly acknowledging anti-Black systemic racism in the child welfare system. Child’s Representative CO
  • So even when decision-makers strive for “neutrality,” the data, the patterns, and the context show that families of color face added burdens.



Note: We will not contact you until the Cast Call is completed. Please ensure you’ve finished that process before proceeding with this form.


Haven’t completed the Cast Call yet? Click below to finish your submission:

Complete the Cast Call Here




© 2025 sports america events.